i am addicted to the internet. but why? what makes it so compelling? i think it's really complex, and that's why it's so powerful. here are some of the reasons why being online is so consuming:
-i may be addicted to the ACTIVITY of learning, reading, posting, looking at profiles, etc.
-i may be addicted to its FUNCTION in that i am procrastinating or avoiding my "real" life
-i may be addicted to embodying the IMAGE i portray online
any thoughts? reactions?
-i may be addicted to the ACTIVITY of learning, reading, posting, looking at profiles, etc.
-i may be addicted to its FUNCTION in that i am procrastinating or avoiding my "real" life
-i may be addicted to embodying the IMAGE i portray online
any thoughts? reactions?
-
Re: addiction
Wed, December 29, 2004 - 7:43 AMinteresting post!
I'll start by mentioning that I don't think I've ever considered myself "addicted" to the internet. In the past I have enjoyed being able to create an identity online, but I admit that I have never really attempted to make that identity much different from what I present to people I know "in real life". Boring me! I think I would like to try it, when I have the time...I have been reading some thigns lately about how people have used online identities to explore various parts of themselves, and it sounds fascinating.
I like looking at people's profiles, observing the way people interact in this mediated fashion [think about it: normally we can't "see" the mediated interactions of others, e.g. email, phone, etc.] and watching group dynamics emerge. I admit that usually I don't get to follow long threads or read posts over long periods of time in a specific group, because I tend to go through extended phases where there's simply no time for me to do those things.
-
Unsu...
Re: addiction
Thu, December 30, 2004 - 3:06 AMTalking to people you'd never met otherwise is one of main reasons i am online. I used to be addicted, nowadays i just spend a lot of time online :).
I've never 'played' with different personalities, although i am sure i am played with by others a lot during the years. Come to think of it, i once used a female sounding nick on icq and left not long after that shocked by the huge amount of desperate men. -
-
Re: addiction
Fri, January 7, 2005 - 12:44 PMamusing--I've never been "hit on" online. I wonder if I've been hanging out in all the wrong places-? ;-)
So, do you feel as if you've "met" people when you're online? I don't, really. I always feel, when I have had a rewarding textual exchange with someone, that I wish I could meet them in person. I guess that extra level is what I enjoy, and it isn't really even "extra"; it's just what we expected of human relationships until the development of media that could move our disembodied voices from one place to another.
"Real" is so relative; now I think a lot of people see the phone as being "real" compared to email, for example, whereas I bet in the past, most pople felt that the phone wasn't real--hence the expression "phoney". I was reading about this in a book the other day and found it fascinating. -
-
Unsu...
Re: addiction
Sat, January 8, 2005 - 2:47 PMThere is always the lack of facial emotions or body language, or there always seem to be a big distance between you and the 'other end'. This distance remains with a webcam and/or mic conversation.
But this distance also creates a certain tension or excitement, most of the persons i met irl after i've met them online bored the hell out of me.
But to anwser your question, at first they are not 'real', this slowly happens over some sessions. Even when those sessions get very personal very fast, which happens quite a lot, only after a couple of sessions, those persons start to become 'real' persons. Maybe it has something to do with having no expectations when meeting someone for the first time?
Indeed, when is someone real? There is a theory that everyone plays a role in their daily lives, like in a stage play. When are we real? When we are ourselves or when we can pinch the other? -
-
Re: addiction
Sat, January 8, 2005 - 9:13 PMPlenty of people used to get addicted to TV/Radio and before that, to going to libraries or hanging out in special social scenes (um... church?).
The internet is what you make of it. It's a library. It's a support group. It's a news source. It's a soap opera. It's a soap box. It's porn. It is all of these things and more, all at once, 24/7/365 and it is getting updated every freakin' Nth of a second.
Why would anyone with even a hint of real intellectual curiosity NOT find that addicting?
Any time, day or night, you get the urge to find out about something it would never occur to you to find out about, you can not only find something out, but you can almost instantaneously find people who will be happy to explain whatever it is at great length.
The fact that Google, in particular, works so goddam hard to find a match for any random jumble of keystrokes means that there's effectively endless supply of WTF for you, since you'll never be able to read every single interesting web page that pops up over the course of a day, much less every page that already exists, much less everything that will be generated over the rest of your lifetime.
The continuous confrontation with the unknown which the internet offers helps humble us and put what we know in the larger Confucian perspective of the vastness of what we don't know. I think that's probably not such a bad thing to which to become habituated.
Honestly... have you ever seen these pictures before?
images.google.com/images
Should you care whether or not you know what that is?
I don't know. But you can always check the ESPN website if you think that might be more important, I guess...
-
-
Re: addiction
Sat, February 25, 2006 - 5:31 AMso obviously the time since the last post here implies maybe some fo you folks kicked the addiction...
if so and nevertheless see this post I'd be grateful for advice about how you dealt with it...
or check out my homepage at sign69.com for an overview of my addiction if you have a fast connection...
-
-
-
-